Case Report
 
Anaphylactic reaction to omeprazole
 
Sangey Chhopel Lamtha1, Ram Naresh Allam2, Caroline Karthak1, Karma Doma Bhutia3
Department of Gastroenterology1, Medicine2
Central Referral Hospital
Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences
5th Mile, Tadong and Department of Microbiology3,
Sir Thutop Namgyal Memorial Hospital
Gangtok, Sikkim – 737101, India


Corresponding Author
: Dr. Sangey Chhophel Lamtha
Email: Sangey79@yahoo.com


Abstract

48uep6bbphidvals|732
48uep6bbph|2000F98CTab_Articles|Fulltext
Proton pump inhibitors (PPI), the most potent inhibitors of gastric acid secretion, have revolutionized the treatment of acid related disorders, including gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer disease, and gastropathy induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). They are combined with antibiotics to eradicate Helicobacter pylori. Since the introduction of omeprazole, a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI), in 1988, several other PPIs i.e., lansoprazole, rabeprazole, pantoprazole, and esomeprazole have been developed. They are generally well tolerated, with minimal adverse effects, most of which are related to the drug’s pharmacokinetic interaction profiles[1]. Although hypersensitivity reactions are rare, several anaphylactic reactions have been reported[2-5].Some reports describe the presence of cross-reactivity between different members of the group, although no definite pattern has emerged[6-9]. We present a case of omeprazole induced anaphylactic reaction which was managed uneventfully.

Case report

A 64-year-old woman received a prescription for omeprazole 20 mg capsules from her general practitioner for peptic symptoms. About 55 minutes after taking the first capsule, she developed malaise, periorbital edema, erythema of the skin, pruritus, nausea, and vomiting. On presentation to our hospital her pulse was feeble and blood pressure was not recordable. After treatment with injection adrenaline (1:1000dilution) 0.5mg subcutaneously, injection hydrocortisone intravenously, injection pheniramine intravenously, injection normal saline infusion, she recovered uneventfully. The acute onset of urticaria, edema, and hypotension and a close temporal association of these clinical signs with the ingestion of the tablet in our patient allow this reaction to be classified as anaphylactic shock, according to the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences.[10]

Discussion

Anaphylactic shock is classified as a sudden and substantial decrease of arterial blood pressure in close temporal association with exposure to a drug or other substance, which is not a vasovagal reaction and is not induced by a direct effect of a drug on cardiovascular function or hemodynamic regulation.

Alternatively, the term anaphylactic shock may be used if clinical signs of shock such as hypotension, tachycardia or bradycardia, no heart rate, or loss of consciousness are present, or when one or both of the following groups of symptoms are also present: (1) itching, erythema, urticaria, angioedema and (2) laryngeal edema or spasm or bronchospasm.[10] Haeney2 reported on a patient who repeatedly developed angioedema and urticaria two hours after ingestion of omeprazole 20-mg capsules but not after use of enteric-coated granules without the capsule shell (which in Europe consists of gelatin, red iron dioxide, and titanium dioxide), suggesting a causal relationship with the capsule shell and not with omeprazole. The triggering constituent was not identified. Bowl by and Dickens 3 reported a patient who developed angioedema and urticaria immediately after taking oral omeprazole 20 mg, which was confirmed by rechallenge. Challenge with omeprazole granules without the capsule shell was also positive, which suggests an allergy to the drug and not to the capsule.

Galindo et al.[5] reported on a patient who developed anaphylaxis a few minutes after infusion of omeprazole 40 mg; evidence of cross-reactivity was provided by skin tests to omeprazole and lansoprazole.

The available evidence indicates that the PPIs currently in use can cause anaphylactic reactions. These benzimidazole derivatives are chemically related, observations in a few patients suggest that cross-sensitivity may occur. However, further study is needed to provide more precise information regarding the frequency of anaphylactic reactions during the use of these drugs. Because anaphylaxis is a potentially serious reaction, healthcare professionals need to be aware when prescribing these agents that PPIs can occasionally cause anaphylactic reactions.

Conclusion

This case report suggests that the PPI can cause anaphylactic reactions and that one should be aware of its life threatening adverse reaction while prescribing PPIs.

References
  1. Esplugues JV, Marti-Cabrera M, Ponce J. Safety of proton pump inhibitors. Med Clin (Barc). 2006;127:790–5.
  2. Haeney MR. Angio-edema and urticaria associated with omeprazole. BMJ. 1992;305:870.
  3. Bowlby HA, Dickens GR. Angioedema and urticarial associated with omeprazole confi rmed by drug rechallenge. Pharmacotherapy. 1994;14:119–22.
  4. Ottervanger JP, Phaff RA, Vermeulen EG, Stricker BH. Anaphylaxis to omeprazole. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996;97:1413–4.
  5. Galindo PA, Borja J, Feo F, Gómez E, García R, Cabrera M, et al. Anaphylaxis to omeprazole. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1999;82:52–4.
  6. Ricciardi L, Fedele R, Mazzeo L, Saitta S, Mancuso V, Isola S. Adverse reactions to pantoprazole. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003;38:800.
  7. Garmendia Zallo M, Sánchez Azkárate A, Kraemer Mbula R, Liarte Ruano I, Núñez Hernández A, Cid de Rivera C. Existe reactividad cruzada entre inhibidores de la bomba de protones? Allergol et Immunopathol. 2004;32:92–5.
  8. Porcel S, Rodríguez A, Jiménez S, Alvarado M, Hernández J.Allergy to lansoprazole: study of cross-reactivity among protonpump inhibitors. Allergy. 2005;60:1087–8.
  9. Pérez Pimiento AJ, Prieto Lastra L, Rodríguez Cabreros MI, González Sánchez LA, Rodríguez Mosquera M, García Cubero A. Hypersensitivity to lansoprazole and rabeprazole with tolerance to other proton pump inhibitors. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117:707–8.
  10. Bankowski Z. Basic requirements for the use of terms for reporting adverse drug reaction. Pharmacoepidemiology Drug Saf. 1992;1:39–45.